2014/11/07

GLEON16: poster, educational program

Uno de los principales objetivos del proyecto SAFER es desarrollar un programa educativo para alumnos donde se trate la conservación y uso de laguna.
La Laguna La Salada, cercana Pedro Luro, fue el sitio elegido para comenzar y probar el programa.
Tenemos el agrado de mostrarles el poster presentado en Global Lake Ecological Observatory Network (GLEON) GLEON16, que tuvo lugar en Orford, Québec, Canadá, desde el 27 al 31 Octubre de 2014.
En éste poster, mostramos el trabajo realizado con alumnos de la escuela secundaria de Pedro Luro, con la colaboración de Laura Zilio (profesora de 6to año, materia: Ambiente, Sociedad y Desarrollo), M. Sc. Rosemary Scoffield y vecinos y miembros de la Sociedad de Fomento del Barrio Parque La Salada.
Agradecemos también a Bel Alfonso y Josefina Zunino, por la colaboración y seguimiento para la toma de muestras de fito y zooplancton.
A todos ellos nuestro agradecimiento!!

One of the major milestones of SAFER project is to develop a child educational program on conservation and use of the lake.
La Salada lake, next to Pedro Luro City, was the place chosen to start and test the program.
We are pleased to show you the poster presented at GLEON16 held in Orford, Quebec, Canada, 27-31 October 2014.
In this poster, we show the work done with students in the school of Pedro Luro, in collaboration with Laura Zilio (6th grade teacher: Environment, society and development), M. Sc. Rosemary Scoffield and Sociedad de Fomento del Barrio Parque La Salada.
We also thank Belén Alfonso and Josefina Zunino, for collaboration and follow-up sampling of phytoplankton and zooplankton.
Our gratitude to all of them!!


2014/11/05

Report on climate change by United Nations’

The United Nations’ report on climate change released on Sunday, November 2, 2014, predicted a gloomy future for the residents of planet Earth. It stated that the dangers of human-caused climate change are no longer debatable; they are real and are even now being felt all over the world. And things will get worse if we fail to take measures now to address this threat.

Among the key findings of the Synthesis Report released by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) on Sunday. The Synthesis Report distils and integrates the findings of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report produced by over 800 scientists and released over the past 13 months – the most comprehensive assessment of climate change ever undertaken.

“We have the means to limit climate change,” said R. K. Pachauri, Chair of the IPCC. “The solutions are many and allow for continued economic and human development. All we need is the will to change, which we trust will be motivated by knowledge and an understanding of the science of climate change.”
The Synthesis Report (116pp) confirms that climate change is being registered around the world and warming of the climate system is unequivocal. Since the 1950s many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia. “Our assessment finds that the atmosphere and oceans have warmed, the amount of snow and ice has diminished, sea level has risen and the concentration of carbon dioxide has increased to a level unprecedented in at least the last 800,000 years,” said Thomas Stocker, Co-Chair of IPCC Working Group I.

The report expresses with greater certainty than in previous assessments the fact that emissions of greenhouse gases and other anthropogenic drivers have been the dominant cause of observed warming since the mid-20th century.
Substantial and sustained reductions of greenhouse gas emissions are at the core of limiting the risks of climate change. And since mitigation reduces the rate as well as the magnitude of warming, it also increases the time available for adaptation to a particular level of climate change, potentially by several decades.

“It is technically feasible to transition to a low-carbon economy,” said Youba Sokona, Co-Chair of IPCC Working Group III. “But what is lacking are appropriate policies and institutions. The longer we wait to take action, the more it will cost to adapt and mitigate climate change.” The Synthesis Report finds that mitigation cost estimates vary, but that global economic growth would not be strongly affected. In business-as-usual scenarios, consumption – a proxy for economic growth – grows by 1.6 to 3 percent per year over the 21st century. Ambitious mitigation would reduce this by about 0.06 percentage points. “Compared to the imminent risk of irreversible climate change impacts, the risks of mitigation are manageable” said Sokona.

These economic estimates of mitigation costs do not account for the benefits of reduced climate change, nor do they account for the numerous co-benefits associated with human health, livelihoods, and development. “The scientific case for prioritizing action on climate change is clearer than ever,” Pachauri said. “We have little time before the window of opportunity to stay within 2ºC of warming closes. To keep a good chance of staying below 2ºC, and at manageable costs, our emissions should drop by 40 to 70 percent globally between 2010 and 2050, falling to zero or below by 2100. We have that opportunity, and the choice is in our hands.”




2014/10/21

Congratulations!!!

Congratulations to
Alfonso, M. B.,
Vitale, A. J.,
Menendez, M. C.,
Perillo, V.L.,
Piccolo, M. C.
Perillo, G.M.E.

Article: ECOSYSTEM ESTIMATION OF OXYGEN METABOLISM FROM DIEL TECHNIQUE IN A SHALLOW LAKE SALINE: THE SALT (ARGENTINA) ".

has-been accepted for publication in Hydrobiologia

2014/10/18

SAFER annual meeting

During November 1-3 there will be held the 3° SAFER annual meeting. It will take place in the Station de Biologie des Laurentides (Universté de Montreal (http://www.sbl.umontreal.ca/).
Because of the SAFER project’s close links to the Global Lake Ecological Observatory Network (GLEON) the meeting is co-located with GLEON Annual Meeting that is taking place in Orford, Montreal from October 27th to October 31st
There will be attending the principal investigators as well as the investigators and students. The main objective of this meeting is to move forward in the research work in progress and in the development of new methodological approaches.

Hydrologic Modeling in the Watershed

This is a summary of the training course in Chile SAFER students, taught by Tom, Brian, Natalie and Beverley.

Hydrologic Modeling in the Watershed
30 Apr – 3 May 2014

Instructors:   

Tom Harmon, University of California Merced (SWAT, HYDRUS and PIHM)
Natalia Hoyos, Corporación Geológica ARES, Colombia (ArcGIS and SpatialAnalysis)
            Brian Reid, Centro CIEP (Ecosystem Services Models)
Beverley Wemple, University of Vermont (ArcHydro and ArcGIS)


General Workshop Objective: Develop skills in delineation and characterization of watershed attributes (contributing area for lakes, wetlands, rivers, or other study system. Followed by basic watershed processes and modeling of watershed hydrology.  The workshop will be conducted in the context of team-based problem solving, based on the cohort of graduate students in project SAFER, and using SAFER sites as case studies, or other student project sites. 

Specific Objectives:
  1. Obtain and develop spatial data sets for characterization of watershed attributes: basin delineation, definition of stream network and discharge points, extraction and calculation of watershed area and corresponding geology/soils/vegetation cover. Familiarization with globally available ASTER elevation models, spatial regression modeling (to model rainfall distribution as a function of elevation).
  2. Introduction to watershed modeling: theory, parameterization and execution of basic watershed models (SWAT, HYDRUS, PIHM).
  3. Discussion/Literature review of the linking of watershed attributes and the evaluation of ecosystem services, or physical drivers of ecosystems.

Participants:
1.      Esteban Flores (Undergraduate, U de Concepcion)
2.      Hector Palacios (Undergraduate, U. de Concepcion)
3.      Alvaro Oniat (Masters, U. de Concepcion)
4.      Roxanna Ayllon (PhD Student, U Austral Valdivia)
5.      Dr. Anna Astorga (Paloma SiteCoordinator)
6.      Dr. Vanesa Perillo (PhD Candidate, U. Vermont)
7.      Facundo Scordo (PhD Candidate, IADO)
8.      Five Staff, DGA Aysen (30 May only)
Resources: 6 computers, shared between two participants each. Participants are requested to bring laptops with ESRI license where possible, however temporary 1 year licenses will be available if needed. Exercises will be conducted in groups of two, with students paired with DGA staff, initially focused on SAFER sites (please arrive with coordinates for your sites, or send to the instructors in advance, to facilitate download of Digital Elevation Data –DEM). Instruction will be multilingual, with only half of the students with advanced English: facilitation by Jorge Okuingttons, Anna Astorga, Roxanna Ayllon, Brian Reid and Natalia Hoyos.
Data and Model Portals:
ArcHydro(needed in addition to the 1 year ESRI instalation package)

Proposed Sites:
(1)   Murta and Ibanez basin (Esteban, Hector, Alvaro, Brian: more data available for more advanced models, three participants working on their theses at this site).
(2)   Paloma Lakes Complex (Anna, some work has already been done)
(3)   Valdivia water supply (Roxanna)
(4)   Sengeur basin, Argentina (Facundo)
Available Data for Chile:
·         DEM: ASTER 30m (what I have has been poorly transformed, lots of banding, need to redo)
·         Hydrography: detailed data digitized from topographic maps.
·         Climate: BIOCLIM, DGA Catastro (20-30 yr summary of flow and meteorological data), and grid of six stations supplementing the Murta/Ibanez watersheds.
·         Vegetation/Land Use: detailed data with very high quality classification for the Aysen region
·         Soils: Soil depth distribution (modeling or interpolation) may be possible based on available raw data from 100+ sites in the region (B. Reid, S. Bertrand).




Agenda:
SPATIAL ANALYSIS using ArcGISand ArcHYDRO, 30 April, 1 May 2014
Beverley Wemple (University of Vermont, USA)
Natalia Hoyos (Corporación Geológica ARES, Colombia)
UNIT 1(1/2 day)

1.       Stream and watershed delineation
a.       DEM processing (fill, flowdirection, flowaccumulation)
b.      Defining lake boundary (extraction by attribute for the lake elevation, useful where lakes are large and or poorly delineated)
c.       Delineating stream networks
d.      Delineating watershed boundaries
e.      Define stream order
f.        Measuring flow length

2.       Topographic metrics
a.       Slope
b.      Aspect
c.       Relief ratio

Exercise:
-          run hydro routines to delineate streams and watershed boundary for example watershed
-          run slope grid and calculate mean slope and relief ratio (do for several subwatersheds)
-          calculate flow length from sample sites
-          Brief discussion on contributing area for defining extents of stream network


UNIT 2 (1/2 day)

3.       Extracting features for watersheds/study areas
a.       Clip (for vector data)
b.      Mask (for raster data)
c.       Buffer (e.g. stream network)
d.      Identity / Intersect / Union??
Exercise –
-          grid combine to overlay watershed boundaries and landuse/landcover to define for multiple watersheds
-          clip stream network for subwatershed
-          buffer high order streams and mask out landcover in stream corridor




UNIT 3 (1/2 day)

4.       Interpolation and spatial data modeling
a.       Kriging (with error estimate maps)
b.      Regression-based spatial models

Exercise:
-          use extract values to determine elevation for precip
-          build regression-based model of precipitation distribution


Watershed Modeling and Ecosystem Services Evaluation, 2-3 May 2014
Thomas Harmon (University ofCalifornia, Merced, USA)
Brian Reid (Centro CIEP, UA Chile)
1.        Rainfall-runoff modeling concepts and model structures (1/2 day)

2.       Model examples and tutorials (1 day)

a.       Water Evaluation and Planning System (WEAP)
b.      HYDRUS-2D
c.       Penn State Integrated Hydrology Model (PIHM)

Exercises and demos:
-          Review of model structure
-          Model domain pre-processing
-          Model input files (meteorology)
-          Calibration and model validation
-          Model output post-processing (using R or Matlab scripts)


3.       Ecosystem Services Valuation and Integration of Watershed Models (1/2 day)

Discussion items:
-          Review of ecosystem service types
-          ES model structures
-          Incorporating water and hydrologic processes in ES models
-          Evaluating climate change impacts using ES models

4.       One-on-one work sessions on model test cases (1.5 day)

Model case studies:
-          Detailed instruction on the use of Hydrus-1D for assessing soil hydraulics
-          Developing input files for meteorological variables
-          Constraining soil hydraulic parameters using Hydrus-1D soils library
-          Parameter identification schemes for soil hydraulic parameters
-          Application of Hydrus-1D to CIEP experimental sites

Allocation of time for course
·         Preparation: including reading assigned papers: 2-3 days
·         Theory and Applications: 4 days @ 8 hours per day

·         Independent assignments and practice sessions: as needed, typically 3-4 hours per evening over 4 days






2014/09/22

Welcome to Safer-blog

As it has done GLEON, we created this blog as a substitute for newsletter.
It is for researchers and students!

Please let us know any news / opinions you would like to share here. : D

The Editorial Team

educationsafer@gmail.com and safer.argentina@gmail.com